Comments on: Need to Rate Everything? Rate Your Church! http://vansunder.com/churchrater/ Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:35:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: David van Sunder http://vansunder.com/churchrater/#comment-125 David van Sunder Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:24:00 +0000 http://vansunder.com/?p=808#comment-125 You're addressing an interesting issue. I hope the publicity you get gains you enough eyeballs to establish yourself while you work out the kinks. Good luck! You’re addressing an interesting issue. I hope the publicity you get gains you enough eyeballs to establish yourself while you work out the kinks. Good luck!

]]> By: JIm Henderson http://vansunder.com/churchrater/#comment-124 JIm Henderson Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:01:19 +0000 http://vansunder.com/?p=808#comment-124 "it looks unprofessionally done, which doesn’t inspire confidence in potential investors or customers. I am interested enough in what they’re building to check back in six months to see where they’re at, but I don’t expect the site to catch on fire." I agree with many of your observations. But we decided to launch when we felt it was "good enough to criticize". Which is what you are offering. Even you admit you might be back in 6 months. Yelp isint focused in churches we are, No other site puts "church and rater" in the same sentence- it is too provocative. We do - which is why we got to your eyeballs. True we have lots to prove but at least we've got a problem many sites would love to have a shot at solving. Thanks for noticing us - every little bit helps “it looks unprofessionally done, which doesn’t inspire confidence in potential investors or customers. I am interested enough in what they’re building to check back in six months to see where they’re at, but I don’t expect the site to catch on fire.”

I agree with many of your observations. But we decided to launch when we felt it was “good enough to criticize”. Which is what you are offering.

Even you admit you might be back in 6 months. Yelp isint focused in churches we are, No other site puts “church and rater” in the same sentence- it is too provocative. We do – which is why we got to your eyeballs.

True we have lots to prove but at least we’ve got a problem many sites would love to have a shot at solving.

Thanks for noticing us – every little bit helps

]]>